home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / amiga / applications / 2349 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  887 b 
  1. Path: lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!tw116
  2. From: tw116@cus.cam.ac.uk (T. Wright)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
  4. Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
  5. Date: 16 Feb 1996 10:32:37 GMT
  6. Organization: University of Cambridge, England
  7. Message-ID: <4g1mg5$jb9@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
  8. References: <4f80sp$m2h@due.unit.no> <1394.6613T995T2132@netspace.net.au> <2445.6614T1150T1609@imaginet.fr> <4862.6619T1138T2039@netspace.net.au>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: apus.cus.cam.ac.uk
  10.  
  11. In article <4862.6619T1138T2039@netspace.net.au>,
  12. Paul Dossett <astroboy@netspace.net.au> wrote:
  13. >UNREGISTERED VERSION (yeproy@imaginet.fr) said:
  14. >
  15. >>Ever tried ShapeShifter? Don't if you don't have a graphic board in your
  16. >>A2000, unless you accept a monochrome display. Graphics throughput is not
  17.  
  18. Monochrome display - makes it thoroughly different from an average Mac 
  19. then! :)  What more do you need for 90% of WP/DTP anyway?
  20.